Globalisation States Discussion

Globalisation is a novel process in that it symbolises the quick integration that societies in the world are going through while creating new challenges whose solutions are crucial to the long-term survival of the planet.Advertising We will write a custom critical writing sample on Globalisation States Discussion specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More There has been an evolution of global threats that threaten security, stability and prosperity of the now tightly interconnected global systems. With increased international cooperation on almost all fronts, there is an increased likelihood of risk freely proliferating easily and undetected across borders. The flawed international system that is in place is increasingly unable to address the novel challenges that face globalisation. Thus, the crippled system is full of design faults that make it difficult for the system to confront challenges presented by the volatility of the contemporar y world organization. In contemporary world politics, both national and global policy making is weak and fragmented and therefore unable to contain complex issues such as terrorism and economic crises leading to catastrophic global crises with far reaching political effects. Fortunately, the global order that has been set by globalisation is largely a product of political and economic orders that exists in the world today. Through forums such as the G7 and G20, globalisation is changeable. Given most globalisation trends are influenced by complex socio, economic and political dynamics, willingness of these dynamic’s sources is key to changing the course of globalisation. International Organisation and Institutions Contemporary world politics is shaped by international organizations that most of the time speak and advance the agenda of the countries they represent. The most dominant organizations today in contemporary world politics include both political and economic grouping s such as the UN, EU, G7, AU, ASEAN, NAFTA and WTO whose hand in world politics is clearly visible. Besides, there are established institutions like the US, a sovereign nation, which is by far the most influential and most powerful of all world groupings.Advertising Looking for critical writing on social sciences? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Faced with growing challenges, international organizations are constantly going through changes that help in mitigating international crises. For instance, some of these organizations like the EU, NATO and AU have established military wings meant to combat crises such as terrorism and narcotics trafficking. They have also set up powerful secretariats some with legislative councils to make laws on issues such as immigration, which apply across the member countries. Despite their role in combating global crises, these organizations have also been accused of creating the very problems the y are meant to address. Failure by these organizations to act like in the case of UN’s failure in Rwanda, and establishment of toothless bodies within them has contributed to the start or escalation of some crises. In some cases, these bodies play a direct role in the start and escalation of crises for instance the war in Afghanistan that was started by the US and UK and supported by UN and NATO. Diplomacy and International Law Diplomacy and international law have always been the preferred mechanism to solve international crises. However, they have both gone through a lot of evolution since World War II. There is increased application on the use of economic sanctions, arms embargos and coercion through soft power for countries to sign international treaties such the nuclear non-Proliferation Treaty that is meant to combat spread of nuclear weapons. Response by nations to international crises is very varied. Existing international laws and diplomatic protocols have restored sa nity to the way countries respond to international crises. In most cases, many countries use established channels like envoy recall to protest to perceived international wrongs.Advertising We will write a custom critical writing sample on Globalisation States Discussion specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Though many countries do reiterate a reserve of the right to unilateral strike on perceived enemy nations, there is consensus among nations that organizations such as the UN have to play a crucial role before such a drastic step is taken. Some of the international bodies offer diplomatic platforms on which world crises are resolved. Some like the UN and G7 have considerable influence in resolving and/or averting these crises. While the UN is legitimate and well suited for this role, the G7 is wields considerable influence in diplomatic circles thanks to their immense wealth. Despite this influence however, the UN is a more legitim ate platform since all nations recognise it and has in place established mechanisms that can deal with such issues. Conflict and Intervention in World Politics The UN Charter that establishes the organization bans the use of or threat to the use of force against sovereign territories and/or in a manner that contravenes UN regulations. However, a state (s) can intervene beyond their national borders by use of military force within another country’s territory for purposes of protecting civilians from real or perceived atrocities in order to avert a humanitarian crisis as was in the case in Libya. Such intervention on humanitarian grounds challenges state sovereignty in that despite the humanitarian undertones, a country’s independence and right to non-foreign interference is violated. In my opinion, this limitation on sovereignty is uncalled for since it can easily become the genesis of unending conflict, destabilizing otherwise stable societies which end up becoming bre eding grounds for criminal elements.Advertising Looking for critical writing on social sciences? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Distinctions between political and humanitarian and political intervention are legitimate because they help in defining the extent to which nations can interfere in one another’s affairs. This critical writing on Globalisation States Discussion was written and submitted by user Namor to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.